Doxastic Reasoning with Multi-Source Justifications based on Second Order Propositional Modal Logic
نویسندگان
چکیده
In multi-agent systems, an agent generally forms her belief based on information from multiple sources, such as messages from other agents or perception of the external environment. While modal epistemic logic has been a standard formalism for reasoning about agent’s belief, it lacks the expressive power for tracking information sources. Justification logic (JL) provides the missing expressivity by using justification terms to keep track of the belief formation process. However, because JL does not make a clear distinction between potential and actual evidence, the interpretation of justification formulas in JL turns out to be ambiguous. In this paper, we present a justification-based multi-source reasoning formalism built upon second-order propositional modal logic. Our framework not only inherits the source-tracking advantage of JL but also allows the distinction between the actual observation and simply potential admissibility of evidence.
منابع مشابه
A system for consistency preserving belief change
We present a dynamic doxastic logic which formalizes belief change for rational agents. It is based on the multi-agent modal logic KD45n, and therefore preserves the consistency of belief. The actions can be seen as announcements of arbitrary formulas to arbitrary groups of agents. We call it pure belief change because there is no change of propositional facts. We give a sound and complete axio...
متن کاملA Semantical Analysis of Second-Order Propositional Modal Logic
This paper is aimed as a contribution to the use of formal modal languages in Artificial Intelligence. We introduce a multi-modal version of Second-order Propositional Modal Logic (SOPML), an extension of modal logic with propositional quantification, and illustrate its usefulness as a specification language for knowledge representation as well as temporal and spatial reasoning. Then, we define...
متن کاملPropositional Attitudes and Causation
Predicting and explaining the behavior of others in terms of mental states is indispensable for everyday life. It will be equally important for artificial agents. We present an inference system for representing and reasoning about mental states, and use it to provide a formal analysis of the false-belief task. The system allows for the representation of information about events, causation, and ...
متن کاملJustification Logic
We describe a general logical framework, Justification Logic, for reasoning about epistemic justification. Justification Logic is based on classical propositional logic augmented by justification assertions t:F that read t is a justification for F. Justification Logic absorbs basic principles originating from both mainstream epistemology and the mathematical theory of proofs. It contributes to ...
متن کاملStrength Factors: An Uncertainty System for a Quantified Modal Logic
We present a new system S for handling uncertainty in a quantified modal logic (first-order modal logic). The system is based on both probability theory and proof theory. The system is derived from Chisholm’s epistemology. We concretize Chisholm’s system by grounding his undefined and primitive (i.e. foundational) concept of reasonableness in probability and proof theory. S can be useful in sys...
متن کامل